From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 9 16:25:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA12667 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 16:25:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from amsoft.ru (amsoft.ru [194.87.86.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA12516 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 16:24:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from am@amsoft.ru) Received: (from am@localhost) by amsoft.ru (8.8.8/amsoft/1.0) id DAA07308 ; Tue, 10 Mar 1998 03:20:27 +0300 (MSK) From: Andrew Maltsev Message-Id: <199803100020.DAA07308@amsoft.ru> Subject: Re: APM power off (patch) In-Reply-To: from "Bruce M. Walter" at "Mar 9, 98 06:45:37 pm" To: walter@fortean.com Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 03:20:27 +0300 (MSK) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Organization: AM'soft X-Location: Oryol (http://www.oryol.ru/), Russia X-Phone: +7 086 229 9988 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > So, step 8) should be: > > 8) reboot or power off, whatever requested. > > Well, I'm actually proposing it's taken out of the kernel (step 8) and put > into the callout functions (step 5). The implementation of the Oh, yes. I finally understand.. it took a time, may be because of my poor english, sorry. To say the truth I see no _big_ advantages in moving that code out of kernel.. to me it looks like a bit ``perfectionistic'' improvement.. which should be done, but.. Anyway, thank you for information and ideas. Andrew, going to sleep (it's 3:18am here in russia) with `shutdown -p +0' :)) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message