From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 14 15:15:12 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2B416A419;
	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru)
Received: from 0.mx.codelabs.ru (0.mx.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73BC13C447;
	Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:15:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru;
	h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender:X-Spam-Status:Subject;
	b=qnmx6ZlzQWd28fO6vESq4uobmYLUvvtSoVN6/crLZdYQEFWHZZSlJr7tplX6LVbCWkrbICbdNieM1s2Fg1e6fFCr1aSgzo4DUedGCkT5REuHUEmxOVcEOaF0e8qhsdtKTvG+iXJPap8pmMuGuGEWzuIz1Q0QZ7YP6WcWOU33xjk=;
Received: from void.codelabs.ru (void.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.25])
	by 0.mx.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	id 1JPfnq-000H5I-Ei; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:15:10 +0300
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:15:09 +0300
From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>
To: Josef Pojsl <jp@tns.cz>
Message-ID: <i/Lmkx/GjpxzqLdQCjJf243w/hg@7sDP7kkrk5jQp0SODPrr0/WdZZY>
References: <20080207141422.GG11393@diehard.n-r-g.com>
	<20080206144104.GL1122@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<jV/l2UkZT+CCNuE6npJv1SBs5CE@UCvaDHSF+GDEPQ7TSpdR+lgUSQM>
	<20080207074944.GA56085@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<Ntfg81bhcEB6BPmKzMb2iTN9oBA@ebJhc+9glC7W5vxxBJVH9quBZr0>
	<BeIqwBu0LkRXuGRr9c834oJe11M@mkgs2gFQr6GPddtmfyJSxMBvIxA>
	<20080208105357.GF1142@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<BT4TiDDxXXg+A3Hm/RZG4ajuso0@iW7JDlNxJglv8iYoJTWnPBJ0iaQ>
	<20080213203012.GB1157@bonifac.tns.cz>
	<mgxG59t6NyZOK/aOCUXqAa4UjwQ@nlDRp1tQLLdsXUKSIGNiprMk72M>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <mgxG59t6NyZOK/aOCUXqAa4UjwQ@nlDRp1tQLLdsXUKSIGNiprMk72M>
Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, farrokhi@FreeBSD.org,
	Claudio Jeker <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com>
Subject: Re: ospf cost and route selection (openospfd)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:15:12 -0000

Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 07:49:34AM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > I have replaced patch-ospfd_packet.c with the new one,
> > and OSPF packets can find their way through again now. Unfortunately,
> > the behavior is the same as with openospfd 4.0; it converges with
> > right costs etc., but with the wrong interface.
> > Everything is exactly the same.
> 
> OK, I will up my gifX interfaces and will try to simulate your problem.

OK, problem recreated.  Will try to understand and fix the issue.
Will drop a mail, once the situation will be more clear.

Thinking, 20%... ;))
-- 
Eygene