From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Sun Oct 29 09:11:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9454FE5E561 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707477263D for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6CB14E5E560; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1CDE5E55F for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 333867263B for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id p186so20969901ioe.12 for ; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 02:11:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=wtpysPv3XUzZIpkJpPSSej6eMfwns9KlT5yLMZ+McxA=; b=hy2dihp2E+N7xrvpnPxYReBJS/dCFW+b1ziQ4JLZvRoNiKDFlOMT00dgUte7u3YMle mxDdptRGaLsOH5Q2dM3bBFzYFnZgGrM67ULf3jHLebiLslgwos1o2q+Kh2tRt8fmGdnt QaOpEFUIfnJUavxpPbelXScCqJdtSRNeqWP/z4fJhs4Hxpd6NV5O5gKIkyp/voXNHu0x 88t8pdhURpG3NDEFvSXYohy1EQezOW22eq0IiKfLZlbyLwg5XqQ5zSJtvsNvWug6K4R8 ZOotlj0UXMRcjw2/4mA+pb7D7rITT4nK8TWFcRYwahsderWGUA+EZsn9CYXqumEaza1S a7vQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wtpysPv3XUzZIpkJpPSSej6eMfwns9KlT5yLMZ+McxA=; b=OVOa+dFNt2i9Dm04jWvu54lS+QzcqqHPYyA/eXLBZ67jtuAVAAvX73azWlEL5FjQbs KXEdBdEsHPcJFHQqBMeBJsLV2GSceML9rfyf2632/BHoKfYxhPUWxiTRHfaTJozWPwag mlgn9WF1l+zLz5YYqnQMs3CAgBdoJlxYoiLE9mCEWibzvyvPcEtGnE4Uf/XZCNbw1rol tYn9T4sQaD4RnbRVWyd/++qjv9C8ckExdrfFv2iK/xcyhbtzoy73H6w5A45AL5VDRz0M TAm6N9Bv9jq49oU+RT0eDE6GqwIHE3gKaQTWAX5Qkw6TTgKUj25uXbMAZYSB87cXBuz3 THWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVBsUegGZTapqYyzPDmWji/tTTY7cmLJK3ADqVkp6Kv27GVjLln DE4CNbiGkDhUAhMkA0iHppbGVmXxzPWbyWJgBlA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QNahgJDSHcP7fWOwcNYKe/LvwuvPVps/Tt/DyrkoacfKt6PLjo/thjrdKhkYiTK7Jh/fD8qxlBu7OsZWmI6yc= X-Received: by 10.36.91.76 with SMTP id g73mr1692475itb.3.1509268289348; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 02:11:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.166.148 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 02:11:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Antoine Brodin Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 10:11:28 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hTCSov1wfUp4_nnlkWxBG3aF9SA Message-ID: Subject: Re: removal of share/dict/freebsd To: Eitan Adler Cc: "hackers@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:11:30 -0000 On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anyone object to removing the file share/dict/freebsd ? It has > not been functionally updated since 2005, and was last touched at all > in 2014. > > While I could add several more terms of the list, there are better > sources of dictionary files available now, and user don't rely on this > particular source for anything. Hi, What is the benefit of the removal, aside from breaking look(1) and some regression tests? Cheers, Antoine