From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 03:41:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2EC16ABDF for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 03:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F37A143D48 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 03:41:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 18929 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jun 2006 03:41:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Wm9/osxOP15b4WaUlg3NkzWVczjaoPjwbWXcyYeSGacJqtoVfU++8g3D/0aj2cXz0uU502SahnSN69GmQfYtLTyO+VPZrUWjZnaKZCSEXJADJUAhZuyl7j5ZyUri6fuPLI4vx5lyVL3ChmCq/uKc3VoJMLZRM2pWeDKllV4HD7Y= ; Message-ID: <20060601034133.18927.qmail@web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.118.60.210] by web32701.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 05:41:33 CEST Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 05:41:33 +0200 (CEST) From: To: Eric Anderson , Michael Vince In-Reply-To: <447E524E.7050400@centtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 11:59:52 +0000 Cc: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: Is anyone working on a port of ZFS to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:41:40 -0000 --- Eric Anderson ha scritto: ... > > > ZFS surely is cool, but I'm not sure how much it benefits FreeBSD > compared to something like journaling, or adding features to our > existing filesystem, or even write support for one of the already ported > read-only filesystems we have (like XFS, or reiserfs). > I'm afraid adding write support to XFS or reiserfs is not easy, and then there's the license issue. ZFS might not have the best license either but we can work with it. Apple's updated HFS license is also something that could be worked with but Apple is interested in ZFS too so it must have something interesting ;-). NetBSD has a Journalling Google SoC, definitely interesting if they get far. Pedro. Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com