From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 23:51:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C287716A4E6; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560B443D45; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:51:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7PNpFN3093612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:51:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:51:10 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: pav@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20060825195110.450a1a7b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1156532704.8612.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <44EF355D.5050208@coyotepoint.com> <1156532704.8612.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org, devon.odell@coyotepoint.com Subject: Re: Fix for ithread.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:51:19 -0000 On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:05:04 +0200 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Devon H. O'Dell p=ED=B9e v p=E1 25. 08. 2006 v 13:37 -0400: >=20 > > I was discussing UMA with Robert Watson yesterday; specifically its=20 > > usage implications in an interrupt context. He suggested adding some=20 > > information to ithread(9) specifying semantics for memory allocation in= =20 > > an interrupt context. So I came up with this tiny patch, shot it jhb@'s= =20 > > way, he reviewed it and told me to shoot it this way. > >=20 > > So here it is, apparently ready to be committed. >=20 > Applied, thanks! After you fixed the hard sentence break issue, right Pav? ;) --=20 Tom Rhodes