From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu May 16 08:30:37 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CF71588C36 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 08:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2607:f740:d:20::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 246578F78C for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 08:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se) Received: from cid.daemonic.se (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454Pkd45YBzDk4k; Thu, 16 May 2019 08:30:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=daemonic.se; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-language:content-type :content-type:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:date :message-id:from:from:references:subject:subject:received :received; s=20151023; t=1557995433; bh=NnyW9DlUaRMXW/yeuAMcCExM 0gE4QAw8qnMr/xGUt/8=; b=pZmRKYis0VJptAWdOEw4pF7VFgNbB4kfeTqnXUma Iy8BEKkAcPAN1gqXPlRqd43AUlHslzDl1zlhEMs37BbpU3ckedy88Hd52yk+NzsB +xcphp3MDH+zFEJpEctGZVZ39bIN5Vma/uUeQdSckkSkbejeoc3SRpLO4nCNuI5F ajc= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mail.daemonic.se ([IPv6:::1]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by cid.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10587) with ESMTPS id fXAr9LDGeEtT; Thu, 16 May 2019 08:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from garnet.daemonic.se (host-90-236-183-53.mobileonline.telia.com [90.236.183.53]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 454Pkc6qR5zDjp8; Thu, 16 May 2019 08:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Inability to build FreeBSD-current amd64 To: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <201905152326.x4FNQ8up005043@ilsoft.org> <6fd6988399603ec68520cec45dff7590ef190a8d.camel@freebsd.org> From: Niclas Zeising Message-ID: <3e65a762-ce32-c1df-8f89-8545538ab521@daemonic.se> Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 10:30:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 246578F78C X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=daemonic.se header.s=20151023 header.b=pZmRKYis; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=daemonic.se; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of zeising@daemonic.se designates 2607:f740:d:20::25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=zeising@daemonic.se X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.73 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.daemonic.se]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[daemonic.se:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[daemonic.se,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[twc.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.72)[ip: (-9.77), ipnet: 2607:f740:d::/48(-4.89), asn: 36236(-3.89), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36236, ipnet:2607:f740:d::/48, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[53.183.236.90.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[daemonic.se:s=20151023]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[daemonic.se.multi.uribl.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 08:30:37 -0000 On 2019-05-16 09:36, Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Niclas Zeising: > >> I run a build WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS, and that worked, on current, last weekend, if >> that's what you're asking about. > >> This won't take away the need for llvm ports in certain ports builds, however, >> such as firefox and mesa. > > So now I wonder why I failed four times straight building current. One definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different result. > > Maybe the build host, 11.1-STABLE from July 30, 2017, was too old? I wouldn't have thought it was too old. > > I could also try an old current host from August 2, 2017, or try to build 12-STABLE from my 11.1-STABLE host. Would I do better to build amd64 or i386 from amd64 host? I presently have no FreeBSD i386 installation, only amd64. > That could be that the toolchain on 11.1 stable is too old to build current. If you've posted the error you're getting, I've missed it, however. Regards -- Niclas