From owner-freebsd-net  Sun Jul 21 14:52: 1 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8DFD337B400; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from patrocles.silby.com (d106.as14.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.134.106])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3080043E42; Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from patrocles.silby.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6LLuKcv005324;
	Sun, 21 Jul 2002 16:56:20 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from silby@silby.com)
Received: from localhost (silby@localhost)
	by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g6LLu11X005316;
	Sun, 21 Jul 2002 16:56:17 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: patrocles.silby.com: silby owned process doing -bs
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 16:56:00 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
	Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>
Subject: Re: MFC status for retransmit timer min/slop
In-Reply-To: <200207211945.g6LJj0ZV006816@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-ID: <20020721165445.K5064-100000@patrocles.silby.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:

>     I believe the basic concept and code is reasonable and the only real
>     issue is whether to make the default slop 1000ms or 200ms.  I would very
>     much like to change the default to 200ms in -stable but I will be happy
>     to MFC the code to -stable with a 1000ms default to begin with, to get
>     it out of the way, and then persue changing the default (on stable)
>     to 200ms as a separate issue.  The default should remain 200ms in
>     -current.

I think that MFCing with 200ms would be best.

Mike "Silby" Silbersack


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message