From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 19 22:09:05 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F211065686;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668B68FC16;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m7JM4db2090782;
	Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:04:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:04:39 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20080819.160439.71174078.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <48AB3408.4030703@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20080819194413.GB16977@elvis.mu.org>
	<48AB32D4.5040904@FreeBSD.org> <48AB3408.4030703@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: usb@FreeBSD.org, alfred@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HEADSUP new usb code coming in.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:09:05 -0000

> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >> Q. Can we change the name from "usb2_" to my favorite name?
> >> A. No.   This is for a short period, stop being so annoying.
> > 
> > Why not just "usb_"? You can then leave it as is then avoiding violating 
> > POLA second time. Otherwise people would confuse it with USB 2.0.
> 
> P.S. I am talking about entries for kernel config here, not about names 
> of directories and source files.

In the fullness of time, this is a great idea.  Now, given the other
reviews that have been offered of the code, I don't think it is a good
use of time to deal with changes of this order.  We should note it and
move on.

Warner