Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Dec 2003 19:11:35 -0500 (EST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
To:        current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: [RC1] Login not possible
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1031213190956.58711B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1031213181941.27754O-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Robert Watson wrote:

> It could we be we should think about bumping _SC_NGROUPS_MAX to 32,
> although this might have substantial ABI impacts we'd have to look into
> carefully.  You can also add optional groups, joined using newgrp(1),
> but the lack of a shadow password database for that is fairly limiting
> (and it's far from user friendly compared to just being a member of more
> groups).

Speaking of which, it would be interesting to know if anyone is running
FreeBSD with larger values of _SC_NGROUPS_MAX, and if so, what operational
comments they might have to make ("recompile everything", "it works fine",
...)

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org      Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1031213190956.58711B-100000>