From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 16  4:19:40 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from tao.org.uk (unknown [194.128.198.234])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8748937B69F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 04:19:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by tao.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 100)
	id 5E5EF31BA; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:19:21 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:19:21 +0000
From: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: cdcontrol and environment vars - opinions please.
Message-ID: <20010116121921.A632@tao.org.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>,
	stable@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

How many people are using cdcontrol and defining the drive name
using one of the following environment variables: MUSIC_CD, CD_DRIVE,
DISC and CDPLAY?

I've no idea why there are so many different options - it seems a
bit daft to me.

Recently we added another one: CDROM.  What I'd like to do is
deprecate use of the others and adopt CDROM as standard.

My question to anyone using the others is whether you'd especially
mind if cdcontrol still worked with the other env names, but
complained a bit that CDROM should be used instead?

Does this sound sensible?
Joe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message