From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 11 12:13:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB67106566C; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aoyama@peach.ne.jp) Received: from moon.peach.ne.jp (unknown [IPv6:2001:380:e06:127::53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C678FC0C; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:13:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aoyama@peach.ne.jp) Received: from moon.peach.ne.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moon.peach.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F0878C4C; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:13:00 +0900 (JST) Received: from artemis (unknown [192.168.2.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by moon.peach.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id B064478C4B; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:13:00 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <34849EA9C0D3417C9784824CC0080090@artemis> From: "Daisuke Aoyama" To: , , "Pete French" References: Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:12:58 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-2022-jp"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tester wanted for multipath failover iSCSI target software X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:13:03 -0000 >I am interested in giving this a try, though not immediately as I >am away from the office at the moment. Do I need to apply a patch >to iscontrol to make it work though ? I can't work it out from your >statement above. Yes, you need. >Than ks. Is the intent to integrate with the base system eventually >rather than have it in ports ? It would be nice to have a native >implementation which could then be integrated with ZFS. istgt is still under development. so I don't think integration. before thinking, I should work to fix more bugs. thank you. -- Daisuke Aoyama