Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:29:40 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: hosted-gcc_20020419.tar.bz2 uploaded Message-ID: <20020424192940.B35128@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <p05111700b8ea33d21f0a@[128.113.24.47]>; from drosih@rpi.edu on Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:58:56PM -0400 References: <20020420194116.A92671@dragon.nuxi.com> <p05111703b8ea1ccbbd40@[128.113.24.47]> <20020422135153.A50570@dragon.nuxi.com> <p05111700b8ea33d21f0a@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:58:56PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > |_ ../ctlinfo.c:231: warning: void format, cjobinfo arg (arg 3) > |_ ../ctlinfo.c:231: warning: void format, cjprivate arg (arg 4) > > Apparently it wants %p to be used with (void *) or (char *), and not > (struct blahblah *). If I cast those parameters to (void *) then the > warning goes away. Is that a change I should make? Yes. > Why does it care > what it's a pointer to, as long as it's a pointer to data? Because not all pointers are potentially the same. > |_ ../net.c:278: warning: pointer of type `void *' used in arithmetic > > Should va_arg() be changed? You (the port) may not be using the proper va_args header. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020424192940.B35128>