From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 10 06:51:27 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D1216A4CE
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:51:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from citi.umich.edu (citi.umich.edu [141.211.133.111])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675F643D41
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:51:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rees@citi.umich.edu)
Received: from citi.umich.edu (dsl093-001-248.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net
	[66.93.1.248])	by citi.umich.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 76DE520820; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:51:26 -0500 (EST)
To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, openafs-devel@openafs.org
From: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
In-Reply-To: Garrett Wollman, Tue, 09 Mar 2004 22:08:25 EST
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:51:27 -0500
Sender: rees@citi.umich.edu
Message-Id: <20040310145126.76DE520820@citi.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] OpenAFS for FreeBSD 5.2 patch 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:51:27 -0000

I suppose in the short term we need yet another configure (or make) option
to specify the location of the kernel build.  But I really detest this
solution.  I would much rather be able to build a single module that would
work with any kernel built from a given set of sources.