From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Thu Mar 30 19:38:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43AED26AA3; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:38:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rezny@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86385E18; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:38:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rezny@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1406) id B776979AA; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:38:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Matthew Rezny To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r437215 - in head/graphics: gbm libEGL libGL libglapi Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:38:22 +0200 Message-ID: <2248499.et5buujvh1@workstation.reztek> Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.0-STABLE; KDE/4.14.30; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170330192313.GA23522@FreeBSD.org> References: <201703291657.v2TGvrpM076369@repo.freebsd.org> <5ecdf3a33e5b6ea0d4341aed906e3800@freebsd.org> <20170330192313.GA23522@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:38:23 -0000 On Thursday 30 March 2017 19:23:13 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 01:57:15PM -0400, Johannes M Dieterich wrote: > > OK, to be very blunt: the current HEAD is just bad for accelerated > > OpenGL. Nothing newer than Ivybridge is supported unless you go with the > > NVIDIA BLOB (which I have zero experience with). OpenCL is even more > > horrible: clover is a joke (I am actually using it for work on carrizo) > > and you'll be hard pressed to find any HW around that would be able to > > use with it unless you are on drm-next. > > Hearing that you're doing OpenCL stuff on AMD APU is a big thing and a > light of hope for me. I recently got that HP laptop on Richland and I > want to play Quake 2 and some OpenCL workloads on it as well. I would > be watching for things to improve in the area. Speaking of which, did > you have a chance to look at the PR I've filed last year: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214204 > > ./danfe Hi danfe, While I've got your attention, could I trouble you to check out PR 217341 and commit it before the quarterly branch if it looks good? It would be nice to have the nvidia drivers current. I was recently asked by the reporter of 216574,which is blocked by the former, to look at these. Also, is nvidia-driver something that you want to maintain, or should x11@ take up maintainership? I am not asking to take it away if you'd like to keep up the maintenance, just offering to take the burden if you'd rather not carry it since I know you have many other ports to maintain.