Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:47:15 +0200 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> To: attilio@FreeBSD.org Cc: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions Message-ID: <5065B873.4070509@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-FndDhKKwydztGCWL71PKdoKkih7aBYCG89KVa2KZEkpBGeg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-FndCQ0YEo9_6x3g-12XEs8QmtyecwkLBX9z_sptnOUNTHrw@mail.gmail.com> <20120829060158.GA38721@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndAaFv2o05MZZceT8Qr4mhPxuzrnmOZ30c3gy8=pnjjZvw@mail.gmail.com> <20120831052003.GA91340@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndAaxQA8NYCFSN629XXi9zMVNyu2TuHjZLvmn3jhzRJb4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndDdDVuwc=NgDeG7XiWW59-%2BLs5wc2GBqbjLOLDUdUb9SA@mail.gmail.com> <20120905201531.GA54452@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndCHSroZFfVgHAW8SUVZhDSaX9qix=aZnHVC_BN_fW6sgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndDr5WmeKXCwSCucQ4w3hPHRBuu36YH1xiW_wKXOkKEdZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndCvc%2BphY_g4CeGfzsj017roxs_C5adjuLuszpEPWO2%2B1g@mail.gmail.com> <20120917140055.GA9037@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndAP9Ua6tRcbrfYY1%2B56O-YbJvmyaUco9K42-0hmchKD6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndAisKoCwLkvXpmW=XhXDRH8me8fMjwrfBuWVqfoA95rmQ@mail.gmail.com> <5061F6E9.6030104@omnilan.de> <5062E0DE.70805@omnilan.de> <CAJ-FndDhKKwydztGCWL71PKdoKkih7aBYCG89KVa2KZEkpBGeg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2BAFBC6867A2078B93B5900C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime): > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer > <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote: >> ... > After many people willing to test fuse on STABLE_9, I made this patch > that at least compiles there: > http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_stable9_241030.patch Thanks a lot! In the meantime I made the original patch compiling. I simply looked at the changes which were made around july in the fuse project to follow changes in head (checkpath(), vrecycle() and vtruncbuf()) and "reverted" them. Since I have no idea about the code I modified, I'm happy that you did a more qualified patch set :-) > Of course, I didn't have a chance to test it because I'm also out for > vacation right now but please do and report. Happy holiday!!! If you're by chance arround the Oktoberfest, drop me a note, I'll pay you a Ma=C3=9F (or any other drink if you don't like =E2=80=9EWiesnbier=E2=80=9C) :-) >> ... >> Some questions: Is this planned to be mfc'd and if so, how can one kno= w? > In which sense "how can one know?". We usually specify MFC timeouts in > the commit message (not sure if this answers your concerns). Yep, that's what I wanted to know. So if there's no MFC timeout in the log, it's not intended to be MFCd ever I guess. Thanks a lot! World/Kernel compiled fine in the meantime, I'll do some sshfs tests. -Harry --------------enig2BAFBC6867A2078B93B5900C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlBluHMACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8iKIQCfVCNSd+P7BFeGDOyJBb0t1xEd MNsAn1CNFJdYdJEdGQlOadWmXdNFF1Y5 =SVeh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2BAFBC6867A2078B93B5900C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5065B873.4070509>