From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 29 09:28:47 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2F416A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:28:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (juliengabel.net1.nerim.net [62.212.119.84])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BFC43F85
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:28:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1])
	by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3E193241FE; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:28:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 90098-02; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:28:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from webmail.thilelli.net (localhost.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1])
	by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id BB079241B1; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:28:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 194.119.92.65
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user jgabel)
        by webmail.thilelli.net with HTTP;
        Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:28:42 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <41988.194.119.92.65.1067448522.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net>
In-Reply-To: <20031029195029.B57490@news1.macomnet.ru>
References: <200310291641.JAA27852@lariat.org>
    <20031029195029.B57490@news1.macomnet.ru>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 18:28:42 +0100 (CET)
From: "Julien Gabel" <jpeg@thilelli.net>
To: "Maxim Konovalov" <maxim@macomnet.ru>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thilelli.net
cc: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How stable is 4.9-RELEASE proving to be?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:28:48 -0000

>> users stick with 4.8-RELEASE is not encouraging. If 4.9 isn't stable, we
>> may be forced to jump over to OpenBSD 3.4 for new production systems.

Regarding the recent paper "Benchmarking BSD and Linux", which results can
be found at http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/, I don't know if it is a good
idea to prefer OpenBSD - even the 3.4 - over FreeBSD.

--
-jg.