From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 19 14:07:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070E51065674 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9CD8FC1A for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb13 with SMTP id 13so225851wwb.31 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:07:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=iHqNUK5DsYa3yghyPnYIocMmjxOTtfIHLp5Peqv3Pis=; b=sTJmRdeKc8NLJOyHob341bdlWkA6P5B643BnCyu7njHtEEcRfCRJYeHVSvmwvH4cKn EJLbtXHjNMSgFo4NW86/na3X8MSteT3fbKMCN5re/xGFxB4q5Yu7NqWJux6IvoiUJ7tR E7XSASd2C8FGQs1FBIInQuGqdOfOo40oQqURM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=f2y2ma9S5v7DLNgWurIyb9AMja1cO5d8Kr+synM5DxdTqVoe4C/4bm7Cq5j4rwj0vg 4rXI+FrHCQjL866Ied39D9emhbVLuN7BGRSjIB697eny80QLQOlHbEvdrmdTPlHMIDgR ZqcD3var0p1IxtYE4srKOXpgs9xpeUtApmqRA= Received: by 10.216.162.78 with SMTP id x56mr3858857wek.80.1279548445058; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spftor1.privacyfoundation.de [87.118.104.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e8sm2292961wej.22.2010.07.19.07.07.21 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:07:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Anonymous To: RW References: <4C42CFDA.3040409@comclark.com> <4C43B5C2.3070403@FreeBSD.org> <20100719142736.5631251f@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:07:14 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20100719142736.5631251f@gumby.homeunix.com> (RW's message of "Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:27:36 +0100") Message-ID: <86iq4bh8fh.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [new port] usage of shar command X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 14:07:27 -0000 RW writes: > On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 19:17:38 -0700 > Doug Barton wrote: >> In any case, thanks for expressing your confusion, it's actually >> really helpful to get information from the perspective of a new user. > > I wonder how many new users have read the bugs section of the shar man > page, and know how to check such files for malicious script lines. > That's not much of an issue for ports submission, but people are > routinely posting these files in the mailing lists. > > Am I the only one that thinks it's odd that in 2010 we're still using > executable scripts to distribute text files? The last time I heard we still use shar(1) and not diff(1) is because some committers use deficient scripts to automate their process of testing.