From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Nov 14 15:34:51 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id PAA27549
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 15:34:51 -0800
Received: from brasil.moneng.mei.com (brasil.moneng.mei.com [151.186.20.4])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA27518
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 15:34:43 -0800
Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by brasil.moneng.mei.com (8.7.Beta.1/8.7.Beta.1) id RAA29533; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 17:33:56 -0600
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Message-Id: <199511142333.RAA29533@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD mentioned in SunExpert
To: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams)
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 17:33:55 -0600 (CST)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199511142321.QAA04121@rocky.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Nov 14, 95 04:21:35 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> In Jim Frost's review of WNT 3.51, FreeBSD is mentioned as one of the
> 'modern UNIX variants' who have an integrated VM and filesystem cache.
> We are placed in the same boat as 'SunOX, HP/UX, and SVR4.

All right!  :-)  This was pointed out to me by a coworker earlier today too.

This is a good reminder, however, that work remains to be done on the
bleeding edge technologies such as lfs...  (read the article)

... JG