Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 13:16:57 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SVN RELEASE_9_2_0 Message-ID: <20131001111657.GE82824@droso.dk> In-Reply-To: <20131001121442.40337dc0@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <2E.C1.15529.0227A425@cdptpa-oedge01> <20131001121442.40337dc0@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:14:42PM +0100, RW wrote: > On Tue, 01 Oct 2013 06:56:32 +0000 > Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > # Is FreeBSD doing something new? I don't see an SVN tag for ports > > for # the 9.2 release. Historically the ports tree was tagged and > > built a # little before -stable got tagged for release. > > > > # Thanks, > > # Jason > > > > Ports don't belong to a specific FreeBSD version. > > > > It's the built packages that are prepared shortly before release. > > > > For the ports and doc trees, you would go for head (current). > > He's not talking about a branch. It was a tag that allowed one to fetch > the snapshot of the ports tree that was included on the release CDs and > from which the release packages were built. Just check out the branch with subversion like you would checkout the tag with cvs. Erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.dk erwin@FreeBSD.org http:// www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131001111657.GE82824>