From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Feb 21  5: 0:45 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE49F11BC7
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 05:00:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it)
Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id LAA13773; Sun, 21 Feb 1999 11:01:57 +0100
From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Message-Id: <199902211001.LAA13773@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
Subject: Re: How to handle jumbo etherney frames
To: dg@root.com
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 11:01:57 +0100 (MET)
Cc: wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199902211037.CAA12487@implode.root.com> from "David Greenman" at Feb 21, 99 02:36:48 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 217       
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>    The jumbo frames are only useful if you also have VLAN support, which we
> don't have currently. We also need support for large mbuf clusters; this

hmmm i don't get this -- why is this related to VLAN ?

	luigi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message