From owner-freebsd-ports Wed May 21 21:35:15 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA29636 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 21 May 1997 21:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA29631 for ; Wed, 21 May 1997 21:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA13878; Wed, 21 May 1997 23:34:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 23:34:52 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Tom Samplonius cc: Matt Pounsett , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pine 3.96 port bug In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 21 May 1997, Tom Samplonius wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 1997, Matt Pounsett wrote: > > install -d -o bin -g bin -m 755 /usr/local/share/doc/pine > > usage: install [-Ccdps] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 file2; > > or file1 ... fileN directory > > *** Error code 1 > > This port will only build on 2.2 or higher. You will need to modify the > port to build on a 2.1 system. This -d flag for install seems to be causing a lot of grief. A number of ports that would otherwise be 100% functional on 2.1 fail to install because of this tiny little quirk. If ports must, for some bizarre reason, use -d flag, maybe we should supply an "install upgrade" package for 2.1.x users containing a binary of install that support the -d option. -john