From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Feb 11 17:34:38 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA03030
          for stable-outgoing; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:34:38 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA03007;
          Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:34:30 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) id RAA14968; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:34:21 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:34:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802120134.RAA14968@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: nate@mt.sri.com
CC: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, msmith@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <199802120052.RAA01846@mt.sri.com> (message from Nate Williams on Wed, 11 Feb 1998 17:52:00 -0700)
Subject: Re: Bumping the minor number on the library?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

 * Since stringlist.c was added to libc, shouldn't be bump the minor number
 * of the library?  This just bit me when I updated, and adding new
 * functionality to a library implies to me a minor number bump.

Yes, since it has not been changed since the last release (2.2.5).
Also, you may want to bump it in HEAD too.

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe stable" in the body of the message