From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 08:58:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B4C16A404; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2454F43D4C; Mon, 8 May 2006 08:58:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net) Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=[192.168.0.18]) by publicd.ub.mng.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fd1Z9-000Mfd-93; Mon, 08 May 2006 17:58:07 +0900 Message-ID: <445F081E.80900@micom.mng.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 17:58:06 +0900 From: Ganbold User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060425) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ganbold , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff References: <445F000C.1080906@micom.mng.net> <20060508083001.GG59504@funkthat.com> <445F02E5.6010304@micom.mng.net> <20060508085442.GH59504@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20060508085442.GH59504@funkthat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: re driver problem (RTL8169 chipset) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 08:58:12 -0000 John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Ganbold wrote this message on Mon, May 08, 2006 at 17:35 +0900: > >> John-Mark Gurney wrote: >> >>> Ganbold wrote this message on Mon, May 08, 2006 at 17:23 +0900: >>> >>> >>>> I'm having trouble to make my Netgear Gigabit PCI GA311 network card >>>> work in 1000baseTX in FreeBSD-6.1RC. It runs fine on 100baseTX mode with >>>> Cat5 cable, however it doesn't with Cat5e/Cat6 cabling in >>>> >>> Does it work at 1000baseTX w/ Cat5 cabling? >>> >>> >> I thought Cat5 only supports 100baseTX and I didn't test 1000baseTX w/ Cat5. >> > > Nope, 1000Base-T (no X) is speced for Cat5 cabling.. As per the 802.3 > spec 40.1: > 1000BASE-T signaling requires four pairs of Category 5 balanced cabling, > as specified in ISO/IEC 11801:1995 and ANSI/EIA/TIA-568-A (1995) and > tested for the additional performance parameters specified in 40.7 using > testing procedures defined in proposed ANSI/TIA/EIA TSB95. > Ok. > >> It is not working at 1000baseTX with Cat5e/Cat6 cabling. >> > > It's wierd that it works at 100Base-TX w/ Cat5, but not w/ Cat5e... > Is there differences in the cable length or something? Not much difference. > Have you tried > w/ just normal Cat5? > Ok, I will test it again in couple of days and let you know. Ganbold