From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Nov 19 20:44:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA06469
          for ports-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:44:18 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca34-12.ix.netcom.com [207.93.143.140])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA06462
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:44:13 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id UAA03441; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199711200444.UAA03441@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <97Nov19.202308pst.177476@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> (message from Bill Fenner on Wed, 19 Nov 1997 20:23:02 PST)
Subject: Re: ifmail UID
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * If 70 isn't available, should it pick some other low UID or just fall
 * back to its current behavior?

Either is fine, but I would prefer for it to stay in the 50-99 range.

Satoshi