From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 2 21:58:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4941F16A404 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 21:58:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABCC13C4C1 for ; Wed, 2 May 2007 21:58:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69433137E2; Wed, 2 May 2007 23:35:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203) id B05781A7C9; Wed, 2 May 2007 23:36:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC67E1A7C7; Wed, 2 May 2007 23:36:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 23:36:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20070502193159.GB42482@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: References: <20070502193159.GB42482@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 21:58:24 -0000 On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: > In particular all ports committers are expected to participate in this > process of eating our own dogfood :) Our marketing folks educated me to use the phrase "drinking our own champagne" instead. :) > 5) CVS will stay frozen for a period to be evaluated (probably another > couple of weeks) to deal with the inevitable remaining fallout as > users encounter yet more problems with the upgrade. Does this freeze apply to the whole ports tree, or only (relatively directly) affected parts of the tree? For example, does this also apply to lang/gccXY? Gerald -- Gerald (Jerry) Pfeifer gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/