Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 11:45:56 GMT From: Bernard Spil <brnrd@FreeBSD.org> To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-branches@FreeBSD.org Subject: git: bf2124c0a7f4 - 2023Q2 - security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1u Message-ID: <202305311145.34VBjuZH060585@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The branch 2023Q2 has been updated by brnrd: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=bf2124c0a7f48fb8f99b6da33161812ea659420f commit bf2124c0a7f48fb8f99b6da33161812ea659420f Author: Bernard Spil <brnrd@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2023-05-31 11:41:20 +0000 Commit: Bernard Spil <brnrd@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2023-05-31 11:45:45 +0000 security/openssl: Security update to 1.1.1u Security: eb9a3c57-ff9e-11ed-a0d1-84a93843eb75 MFH: 2023Q2 (cherry picked from commit 11c58a2694053ae22d77c36419a7f6064cb8b32f) --- security/openssl/Makefile | 3 +- security/openssl/distinfo | 6 +- security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 | 305 ----------------------------- security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 | 108 ---------- security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 | 73 ------- 5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 491 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/openssl/Makefile b/security/openssl/Makefile index bd06e4c9cd84..958222c88b4a 100644 --- a/security/openssl/Makefile +++ b/security/openssl/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ PORTNAME= openssl -PORTVERSION= 1.1.1t -PORTREVISION= 2 +PORTVERSION= 1.1.1u PORTEPOCH= 1 CATEGORIES= security devel MASTER_SITES= https://www.openssl.org/source/ \ diff --git a/security/openssl/distinfo b/security/openssl/distinfo index 16117272b3a7..a37ebb5597c4 100644 --- a/security/openssl/distinfo +++ b/security/openssl/distinfo @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -TIMESTAMP = 1675796483 -SHA256 (openssl-1.1.1t.tar.gz) = 8dee9b24bdb1dcbf0c3d1e9b02fb8f6bf22165e807f45adeb7c9677536859d3b -SIZE (openssl-1.1.1t.tar.gz) = 9881866 +TIMESTAMP = 1685529813 +SHA256 (openssl-1.1.1u.tar.gz) = e2f8d84b523eecd06c7be7626830370300fbcc15386bf5142d72758f6963ebc6 +SIZE (openssl-1.1.1u.tar.gz) = 9892176 diff --git a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 b/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 deleted file mode 100644 index 4eec12371299..000000000000 --- a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0464 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,305 +0,0 @@ -From 879f7080d7e141f415c79eaa3a8ac4a3dad0348b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org> -Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100 -Subject: [PATCH] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints - -A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions -of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains -that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this -vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers -exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service -(DoS) attack on affected systems. - -Fixes CVE-2023-0464 - -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> -Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com> -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20569) ---- - crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h | 8 +++++++- - crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c | 12 +++++++++--- - crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- - 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h -index 5daf78de4585..344aa067659c 100644 ---- crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h.orig -+++ crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h -@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st { - }; - - struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st { -+ /* The number of nodes in the tree */ -+ size_t node_count; -+ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */ -+ size_t node_maximum; -+ - /* This is the tree 'level' data */ - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels; - int nlevel; -@@ -159,7 +164,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk, - X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data, - X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, -- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree); -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, -+ int extra_data); - void policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node); - int policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl, - const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid); -diff --git a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c -index e2d7b1532236..d574fb9d665d 100644 ---- crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c.orig -+++ crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c -@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data, - X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, -- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, -+ int extra_data) - { - X509_POLICY_NODE *node; - -+ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */ -+ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum) -+ return NULL; -+ - node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node)); - if (node == NULL) { - X509V3err(X509V3_F_LEVEL_ADD_NODE, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE); -@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - node->data = data; - node->parent = parent; -- if (level) { -+ if (level != NULL) { - if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) { - if (level->anyPolicy) - goto node_error; -@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - } - -- if (tree) { -+ if (extra_data) { - if (tree->extra_data == NULL) - tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null(); - if (tree->extra_data == NULL){ -@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, - } - } - -+ tree->node_count++; - if (parent) - parent->nchild++; - -diff --git a/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c -index 6e8322cbc5e3..6c7fd3540500 100644 ---- crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c.orig -+++ crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c -@@ -13,6 +13,18 @@ - - #include "pcy_local.h" - -+/* -+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to -+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes. -+ * -+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the -+ * door on CVE-2023-0464. -+ */ -+ -+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX -+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000 -+#endif -+ - /* - * Enable this to print out the complete policy tree at various point during - * evaluation. -@@ -168,6 +180,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; - } - -+ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */ -+ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX; -+ - /* - * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3. - * -@@ -184,7 +199,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - level = tree->levels; - if ((data = policy_data_new(NULL, OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL) - goto bad_tree; -- if (level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) { -+ if (level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) { - policy_data_free(data); - goto bad_tree; - } -@@ -243,7 +258,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, - * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise - */ - static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, -- X509_POLICY_DATA *data) -+ X509_POLICY_DATA *data, -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - { - X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1; - int i, matched = 0; -@@ -253,13 +269,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i); - - if (policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) { -- if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL) -+ if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - matched = 1; - } - } - if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) { -- if (level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) -+ if (level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - } - return 1; -@@ -272,7 +288,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise. - */ - static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, -- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache) -+ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache, -+ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - { - int i; - -@@ -280,7 +297,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i); - - /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */ -- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data)) -+ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree)) - return 0; - } - return 1; -@@ -311,7 +328,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */ - data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set; - data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS; -- if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) { -+ if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) { - policy_data_free(data); - return 0; - } -@@ -373,7 +390,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, - } - /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */ - if (last->anyPolicy && -- level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) -+ level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) - return 0; - return 1; - } -@@ -555,7 +572,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, - extra->qualifier_set = anyPolicy->data->qualifier_set; - extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS - | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE; -- node = level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, tree); -+ node = level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, tree, 1); - } - if (!tree->user_policies) { - tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null(); -@@ -582,7 +599,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) - - for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) { - cache = policy_cache_set(curr->cert); -- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache)) -+ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree)) - return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; - - if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY) -From fd42c9126844f5eefa76872a1ffe5f529f8f75df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> -Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:37:22 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] Prepare for 1.1.1u-dev - -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> -Release: yes ---- - CHANGES | 4 ++++ - NEWS | 4 ++++ - README | 2 +- - include/openssl/opensslv.h | 4 ++-- - 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES -index 1e2d651b7514..f18b08cb0ee2 100644 ---- CHANGES.orig -+++ CHANGES -@@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ - https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commits/ and pick the appropriate - release branch. - -+ Changes between 1.1.1t and 1.1.1u [xx XXX xxxx] -+ -+ *) -+ - Changes between 1.1.1s and 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023] - - *) Fixed X.400 address type confusion in X.509 GeneralName. -diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS -index 2724fc4d85ba..8a18516d8609 100644 ---- NEWS.orig -+++ NEWS -@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ - This file gives a brief overview of the major changes between each OpenSSL - release. For more details please read the CHANGES file. - -+ Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1t and OpenSSL 1.1.1u [under development] -+ -+ o -+ - Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1s and OpenSSL 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023] - - o Fixed X.400 address type confusion in X.509 GeneralName (CVE-2023-0286) -diff --git a/README b/README -index b2f806be3a44..1957cf1f5515 100644 ---- README.orig -+++ README -@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - -- OpenSSL 1.1.1t 7 Feb 2023 -+ OpenSSL 1.1.1u-dev - - Copyright (c) 1998-2022 The OpenSSL Project - Copyright (c) 1995-1998 Eric A. Young, Tim J. Hudson -From fa425f20955c7948faed27f69ae4544f89c108ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org> -Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2023 14:29:22 +1100 -Subject: [PATCH] changes: note about policy tree size limits and circumvention - -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> -Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com> -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20569) ---- - CHANGES | 8 +++++++- - 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES -index f18b08cb0ee2..17caf6775bfe 100644 ---- CHANGES.orig -+++ CHANGES -@@ -9,7 +9,13 @@ - - Changes between 1.1.1t and 1.1.1u [xx XXX xxxx] - -- *) -+ *) Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree to mitigate -+ against CVE-2023-0464. The default limit is set to 1000 nodes, which -+ should be sufficient for most installations. If required, the limit -+ can be adjusted by setting the OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX build -+ time define to a desired maximum number of nodes or zero to allow -+ unlimited growth. -+ [Paul Dale] - - Changes between 1.1.1s and 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023] - diff --git a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 b/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 deleted file mode 100644 index db4b01e81287..000000000000 --- a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0465 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,108 +0,0 @@ -From 8bc232b14624b7af01801d7940b7dec59b3ae47d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> -Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:31:25 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] Updated CHANGES and NEWS for CVE-2023-0465 - -Also updated the entries for CVE-2023-0464 - -Related-to: CVE-2023-0465 - -Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20588) ---- - CHANGES | 9 ++++++++- - NEWS | 4 +++- - 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES -index 17caf6775bfe..efccf7838e65 100644 ---- CHANGES.orig -+++ CHANGES -@@ -9,12 +9,19 @@ - - Changes between 1.1.1t and 1.1.1u [xx XXX xxxx] - -+ *) Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are -+ silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped -+ for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert -+ invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the -+ certificate altogether. (CVE-2023-0465) -+ [Matt Caswell] -+ - *) Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree to mitigate - against CVE-2023-0464. The default limit is set to 1000 nodes, which - should be sufficient for most installations. If required, the limit - can be adjusted by setting the OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX build - time define to a desired maximum number of nodes or zero to allow -- unlimited growth. -+ unlimited growth. (CVE-2023-0464) - [Paul Dale] - - Changes between 1.1.1s and 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023] -diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS -index 8a18516d8609..36a9bb6890bf 100644 ---- NEWS.orig -+++ NEWS -@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@ - - Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1t and OpenSSL 1.1.1u [under development] - -- o -+ o Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates -+ (CVE-2023-0465) -+ o Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464]) - - Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1s and OpenSSL 1.1.1t [7 Feb 2023] - -From b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> -Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000 -Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf - certs - -Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we -later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf -cert was bad. - -Fixes: CVE-2023-0465 - -Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> -Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20588) ---- - crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 11 +++++++++-- - 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -index 925fbb541258..1dfe4f9f31a5 100644 ---- crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c.orig -+++ crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c -@@ -1649,18 +1649,25 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx) - } - /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */ - if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) { -- int i; -+ int i, cbcalled = 0; - - /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */ -- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { -+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { - X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i); - - if (!(x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY)) - continue; -+ cbcalled = 1; - if (!verify_cb_cert(ctx, x, i, - X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION)) - return 0; - } -+ if (!cbcalled) { -+ /* Should not be able to get here */ -+ X509err(X509_F_CHECK_POLICY, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR); -+ return 0; -+ } -+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */ - return 1; - } - if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) { diff --git a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 b/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 deleted file mode 100644 index f3635e6a8066..000000000000 --- a/security/openssl/files/patch-CVE-2023-0466 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,73 +0,0 @@ -From 0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> -Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:15:47 +0100 -Subject: [PATCH] Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() - -The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking. - -Fixes: CVE-2023-0466 - -Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> -Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> -(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20564) ---- - CHANGES | 5 +++++ - NEWS | 1 + - doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod | 9 +++++++-- - 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) - -diff --git a/CHANGES b/CHANGES -index efccf7838e65..b19f1429bbb0 100644 ---- CHANGES.orig -+++ CHANGES -@@ -9,6 +9,11 @@ - - Changes between 1.1.1t and 1.1.1u [xx XXX xxxx] - -+ *) Corrected documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() to mention -+ that it does not enable policy checking. Thanks to -+ David Benjamin for discovering this issue. (CVE-2023-0466) -+ [Tomas Mraz] -+ - *) Fixed an issue where invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are - silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped - for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert -diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS -index 36a9bb6890bf..62615693fab8 100644 ---- NEWS.orig -+++ NEWS -@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ - - Major changes between OpenSSL 1.1.1t and OpenSSL 1.1.1u [under development] - -+ o Fixed documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() (CVE-2023-0466) - o Fixed handling of invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates - (CVE-2023-0465) - o Limited the number of nodes created in a policy tree ([CVE-2023-0464]) -diff --git a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod -index f6f304bf7bd0..aa292f9336fc 100644 ---- doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod.orig -+++ doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod -@@ -92,8 +92,9 @@ B<trust>. - X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B<param> to - B<t>. Normally the current time is used. - --X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled --by default) and adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set. -+X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set. -+Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable -+policy checking. - - X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled - by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B<policies>. Any existing -@@ -377,6 +378,10 @@ and has no effect. - - The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i. - -+The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as -+enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this. -+The documentation was changed to align with the implementation. -+ - =head1 COPYRIGHT - - Copyright 2009-2020 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202305311145.34VBjuZH060585>