From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 29 03:04:17 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8A91555962 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C651672694 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([92.193.229.77]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue011 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1Mnq8Y-1gdA4l4ANW-00pKjj; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 04:04:14 +0100 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 04:04:13 +0100 From: Polytropon To: mayuresh@kathe.in Cc: Michael Sierchio , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Sending Tcsh to packages/ports ... Message-Id: <20190329040413.1aa78c31.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <695ab639fc872647cef88e09f8e4162f@kathe.in> References: <64780f09d4251b9641e3bca39000ae2d@kathe.in> <695ab639fc872647cef88e09f8e4162f@kathe.in> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:zc4wc4z0DH6F6/FpWd99maYP4H/PexrjGX70z+5JThSnCGhUATf W2ceoEDN7js9cEhQtvfRm03cwrFKKGzM/Uhv7hz7fGrK1mssm7U8c0Cz3ur6WPXfAbg/t83 vecDvdaNxdIlJ/wBX6kksNAHDR7EiVxJNzH6eWjminUb76QQld4aWKUXC1CNhttUmKlJI3z VK3ANErFOio9naH5oBBwQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:ygznJzxJ7v4=:RXwpDfrfpeSHN6GXSt0mnC Q7lUcE8s4j/2WH2j9f27r306yy8bxOEWHOhjt3TpabWC1Tv957p0KUU9T00EcyU0KOUP9MAK6 iJJVPtPPYAK6jfZjfabijNOiZHQkFkVPqfTRJ1foCRxwd+2U5GIQY5ogbNNfJ8TG9i6pMV6UJ xo1KPLnrenDfx6igrwdj7DGMykULZT3j2GH9petoI95XHnHYMma6EelD7WRn7deIPxJcd4IwS 4jTSR9MMaYoC8qW3/krcx0xfFISsiuI95NyVINJckd6+EgqZlSeFM/CFIkB1Ku0TfbVUqLNQD WV3jZwm9O2aM9aOoj33ObIx4dzNwHSS9UPyqyPZDQ6E668s/att1AOfFpCbMDyJht5VwNawny mbD49UQDh/aLN3BEardhZ7W3qpwPgAHOxc8RKNKSuqa5zIRWNfm9/cP4nhHOWkjaNDOtZ4eQq h6hjnJl9NinRuIu+bQi12iNz8WG8pzu3hT9zxg9GErlCzTcAURr3Pb8JCgaclaenpaS3EX3sI oEHlrGCP3yl++aMqceKgzeASZpYAPE0595WZ82KQ8aTVBFhrXjK6nhVPp8fLpaUvd3znPf1sw QfLffp3QAMRUvd6R+iMr78fGMNholY1eLz0rkjs/nn+TuE9Q3XcukKPQas5Z10CqCddlQW9BV ut0OLslxWXEbQJ4Aw1Nz+RlEuie1bThlOlQzJQLCoDx5/iy7jrINcmClpIgUl07b+JeBIat/c uajy7y8jSejM/366tTFZTgXcdiPdnHz2S+oExKyYbNIyaVmdyzTNes8rpAI= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C651672694 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.80 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx01.schlund.de]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[77.229.193.92.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.73)[0.727,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.57)[0.567,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.95)[0.951,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[135.126.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[135.126.227.212.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.16)[ip: (0.53), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.31), asn: 8560(1.61), country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:04:17 -0000 On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:36:49 +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > Couldn't you have simply done; > ls -lh *csh > instead? > Also you can see they are the same binary. No, because -l doesn't provide the information about the inode (which is the same), and -h only affects the size display. You can see they are the same size (minus unit conversion and rounding, of course!), but you cannot conclude they are of the same content, not can you conclude that they are actually the same file, which means, only _one_ inode. You need the -i option to examime the inodes, and to properly conclude that csh and tcsh are hardlinked. > Doesn't matter that it is small, why have stray stuff lying around? I wouldn't call the C shell a stray shell yet. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...