From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 21 03:04:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9254E16A492; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 03:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B589443D49; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 03:04:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k8L34QEi047231 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:04:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k8L34PIR047230; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:04:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:04:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:18:28 +0000 Cc: Paul Eggert , tjr@freebsd.org Subject: replacing FreeBSD's -lgnuregex with GNUlib's version X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 03:04:29 -0000 A recent discussion on the gm4 and gnulib mailing lists over the merits of gm4's bundling of its own regex implementation has produced the suggestion, that we replace our src/gnu/lib/libregex (which is currently obtained from fedora-glibc-2_3_4-21) with gnulib's implementation. The latter is claimed to be more actively maintained and with more bug fixes, than glibc people have managed to incorporate. Does anyone have a strong preference for fedora/glibc implementation currently in use, or should we follow this advice (source -- regex' maintainer for gnulib -- CC-ed) and switch over? -mi From: Paul Eggert Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:47:01 -0700 Message-ID: <87y7seayoa.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> > :-( Are there regex-patches currently waiting to be merged into GNU's libc? You can just do a diff between glibc and regex to find the list of patches. They aren't marshaled into a coherent set of small patches, which is the bottleneck. However, you _can_ just use the gnulib version, which is a popular option. [...]