Date: 14 Dec 1999 22:02:46 +0100 From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFS vs softupdates Message-ID: <836b9m$194a$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912142017180.87073-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> wrote: > On a laptop with 64 megs of RAM, what makes more sense for performance > improvements: softupdates or linking swap to a MFS ramdisk? I'm not sure what you mean by "linking swap to a MFS ramdisk". If you are talking about putting /tmp on an MFS filesystem, which in return resides in virtual memory, then the answer to your question is "both". I'm using softupdates and /tmp on MFS as a matter of course. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?836b9m$194a$1>