From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 27 08:49:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CC920E for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:49:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluca1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5908FC08 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fo13so16463478vcb.13 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:49:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dKhZWA1FDD4v1JTSH97QPQMybS6AB9VX95F544/YikE=; b=OQWcbpL/8ZPTYrzyBybdfKAC70HVIIk2LFxdghHrMAsabG0ffyy/eQL8tPnfZpVA61 Y1w0bOu7T1Nf5qUqPSOP/q5FQmbIFldEwMPuXWCYlQcdUUNkob1LG5Caz96le505+hak Nb6GrBBFxY1I9CqZFNUPJkNsLDOZsokJjXTsbHKNUttBz51C9DbBzz2mHAlXf2WcFoA3 Yt/uTlH021OVfjoBuM+C59ve7PfbGUKaToitLmpiQR4JT4v6SH0cmL9VbRrjSWyKEbn3 F7ZYU+6o4AH2eO1YXv7deEGzJg3hB1OAkVOiI7m1FEdqUzTS7JLumdGXIVgxRMEcjN19 XTuA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.77.101 with SMTP id r5mr20191715vdw.25.1354006141675; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:49:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: fluca1978@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.2.137 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:49:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 09:49:01 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OyRTf0RXyftl3-_Dgql_GKkfLXI Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: simple patch for portsnap to use wget From: Luca Ferrari To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:49:02 -0000 Sorry, back to list. On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > Do you aware that if wget tries download from https, and there is > self-signed certificate, then it fails, and ask for --no-check-certificate > option? > How do your patch deal in that case? It simply does not. Are the usage of ports allowed to provide self-signed certificates over https? However I think it is possible to make an option in portsnap.conf to allow for no-check-certificate option for wget. Luca