From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Mar 3 17:18:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA14106 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 17:18:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA14101 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 17:18:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from henrich@localhost) by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.4) id UAA00544 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 20:18:20 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Henrich Message-Id: <199703040118.UAA00544@crh.cl.msu.edu> Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 20:18:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <199703030304.TAA11433@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Mar 2, 97 07:04:11 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Well, the old gcc on FreeBSD-1.0 turns out that it runs a little slower > than the one that I have on my FreeBSD-3.0 system. > > I can't seem to crack 397k so at this stage I would say that someone > has to analyze the output of the compiler to optimized the client further . > > Maybe if I overclock my PPro to 250MHz and clock my bus at 60MHz ... Well I gave in and told my Micron to blast its BIOS in favor of the current intel BIOS, and then snarfed your binary.. This has gotten me up to 396680 (back on top! :) but I cant get it to break 397k. I was hoping the new bios would give me finer grain control over memory timings -- no such luck, but it does let me put my face on the boot screen, so its worth something :) -Crh Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich