Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:52:19 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: jacks@sage-american.com Cc: Marcus Collins <marcus@writeclick.co.za>, Joe & Fhe Barbish <barbish@a1poweruser.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvsup port=www Message-ID: <20020201145218.B15086@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20020201154725.018e6ae0@mail.sage-american.com>; from jacks@sage-american.com on Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:47:25PM -0600 References: <LPBBIGIAAKKEOEJOLEGOOEFHCGAA.barbish@a1poweruser.com> <LPBBIGIAAKKEOEJOLEGOOEFHCGAA.barbish@a1poweruser.com> <20020201225139.A45058@davinci.writeclick.co.za> <3.0.5.32.20020201154725.018e6ae0@mail.sage-american.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:47:25PM -0600, jacks@sage-american.com wrote: > But, unless you have the actual tarballs already, it doesn't guarantee that > you'll get the latest install even though the port files promises the > latest version will be fetched. I have had this just happen on Samba.... No, I believe it should always fetch the latest version of the port. Can you explain what you mean, a bit more? Kris --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8WxwiWry0BWjoQKURAmdMAJwLxCqMElGK4/M1CUn8ft4UxkB+0wCg/AKt OgFGUB6QSxtomStDxAjl76o= =HfJ9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gj572EiMnwbLXET9-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020201145218.B15086>