From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 7 22:37:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA10029 for current-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 22:37:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from thunderdome.plutotech.com (root@thunderdome.plutotech.com [206.168.67.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA09984 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 22:36:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ken@panzer.plutotech.com) Received: from panzer.plutotech.com (ken@panzer.plutotech.com [206.168.67.125]) by thunderdome.plutotech.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA28716; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 23:36:56 -0700 (MST) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.plutotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) id XAA08678; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 23:36:54 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199801080636.XAA08678@panzer.plutotech.com> Subject: Re: AccelX In-Reply-To: from Andrew Ryder at "Jan 7, 98 10:26:00 pm" To: aryder@bestweb.net Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 23:36:53 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Kenneth Merry X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28s (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Andrew Ryder wrote... > Does anyone know how Accelx 4.1 is on 3.0? I had Accelx 4.1 working on > 2.2.5-STABLE fine but I cvsup'd to 3.0 and wonder'd if the same results > were there.. anyone know? I've got Accelerated X 4.1 running on one of my -current machines. It works fine, but you may want to just install the X server, and not any of the other stuff that comes on the CD. If you install everything, it installs another xterm binary, and your utmp will be a bit messed up. (I think they probably compiled it under 2.2.?, so that's probably the source of the problem.) So, I just use the Accelerated X server, but XFree86 utilities. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@plutotech.com