From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 28 22:08:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7D816A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:08:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E82F43D2F for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:08:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd07.aul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1CjPVy-0003kC-02; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:08:26 +0100 Received: from BigBrother.leidinger.net (E43smcZlrelnch43XNSCmPH4QdWAMPzrth3ZPkJnpaqmDJogSpZ2gT@[62.226.112.159]) by fmrl07.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1CjPVs-0MU9xY0; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:08:20 +0100 Received: from [192.168.3.20] (airlaptop [192.168.3.20]) iBSM9IAb012895; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:09:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) From: Alexander Leidinger To: Jeremy Messenger In-Reply-To: References: <20041224081549.GA34007@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 23:07:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1104271678.782.41.camel@luna.leidinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: E43smcZlrelnch43XNSCmPH4QdWAMPzrth3ZPkJnpaqmDJogSpZ2gT@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: d1b1e30c-75f3-44d7-a34a-d16dffbdd038 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: HEADS UP: linux_base-8 upgrade requires immediate testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:08:28 -0000 Am Montag, den 27.12.2004, 18:10 -0600 schrieb Jeremy Messenger: > I only notice many problems with linux ports are that those pkg-plist need > to be fix. Sorry, I forgot to '>&' to create log because it was over > scroll in my screen when I 'pkg_delete -f linux-\*' to deinstall linux > apps then 'pkg_delete -f linux\*' to deinstall linux_base-8. More like > linux_base-8, linux-XFree86-libs, linux-atk, linux-pango, linux-gtk2 and > few other linux-* pkg-plist. You got those messages because you used "pkg_delete -f". They aren't deinstalled in reversed dependency order, they are deinstalled in either lexicographic order ("ls -1d /var/db/pkg/linux*") or in create-time order ("find /var/db/pkg -name linux\* -print")... I'm too laze to look up which order is used. If you use pkg_deinstall (from portupgrade fame), it deinstalls in the reversed dependency order. This doesn't means the patch is free of flaws. An experimental build on the cluster showed some problems. We've through several rounds of bugfixing. So far (the patch you've tested) we've fixed the major problems (except one or two which we are investigating right now). Some minor ones (since Kris hasn't forwarded those yet, I assume those are general flaws of the current state of our linux-bits in the ports collection :-) ) can be fixed after the patch hits the tree. Bye, Alexander.