From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 2 11:23:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA15127 for current-outgoing; Thu, 2 May 1996 11:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xi.dorm.umd.edu (root@xi.dorm.umd.edu [129.2.152.45]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA15120 for ; Thu, 2 May 1996 11:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (smpatel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xi.dorm.umd.edu (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id OAA02781; Thu, 2 May 1996 14:23:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 14:23:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Sujal Patel X-Sender: smpatel@xi.dorm.umd.edu To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: LINUX COMPAT_LINUX In-Reply-To: <271.831057384@critter.tfs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2 May 1996, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I'ts renamed to COMPAT_LINUX, which I'm told is also bad, but at least > it doesn't break the compile of the kernel. > > It may change name again if COMPAT_LINUX is too bad for compatibility... COMPAT_LINUX is also what NetBSD uses. Let's keep it this way, so that we are a little bit more standard. Sujal