From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 9 00:14:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2129F16A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 00:14:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF3743D1D for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 00:14:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779B6F194B for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00732-06 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DB0F193B for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:14:03 -0800 (PST) From: Sean McNeil To: current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:14:03 -0800 Message-Id: <1110327243.4520.6.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com Subject: move to gcc 3.4.3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 00:14:07 -0000 Is there plans to move -current to the latest stable gcc? It was released back in November and includes some significant improvements. I have been stung by the -O2 issue with amd64 now. The ports collection compiles everything with "-O2 -fno-strict-alias -pipe". tcl8.4 is broken when compiled this way. I had to add to my /etc/make.conf my own CFLAGS. With gcc 3.4.3, not only have many bugs been fixed, but the amd64 has been ported to using the DFA processor pipeline description. As far as I understand, DFA is getting all the attention and should provide more support by the gcc community for us amd64 users. Cheers, Sean