From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jun 25 10:31:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from caspian.plutotech.com (caspian.plutotech.com [206.168.67.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E15415011 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:31:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gibbs@caspian.plutotech.com) Received: from caspian.plutotech.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by caspian.plutotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA01902; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:31:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from gibbs@caspian.plutotech.com) Message-Id: <199906251731.LAA01902@caspian.plutotech.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , current@FreeBSD.ORG, tech-kern@NetBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Changing the semantics of splsoftclock() In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:15:55 PDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:31:20 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ I've dropped tech@openbsd.org based on a request from Theo since he cannot post back to some of these lists. ] >Why have splr semantics? That is, it raises to splsoftclock if current >priority is lower, else doesn't fiddle with it. This is what I meant to suggest, but if this is not doable, create a new spl. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message