From nobody Wed Mar 25 16:46:03 2026 X-Original-To: pkgbase@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fgt8S0GXRz6WVkv; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R13" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4fgt8R6stFz3PVp; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1774457176; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=C32o+w3bncCsYAp5Cd+5entwNKbDUGmDYasV+grngKw=; b=Y6bLfMcb4BZeoumWftsxMSP2NgoRel/DHQUFE6EhNdb5LRynnoV56v8yUKpVn1Pqk7pqxe H9oJSiRhCkcVrH3ZBCc7ck+TpqP6owMsaQCy3dAuV5p0Ji0lOxO/yxBneq5fQXzcGw2vu9 4az6V9pYNz6Pedsrda0ytiB3qH2+094QsIVeI4PUBV2OySyiU2o0dJVKjlfZZWmA8vjox8 y+rJhstm1pC1BtlhanQX0GD6FXizBIpFbjDrH3nNJ3bOMRDxkEIwwVRZKmPxbAklDo/MMb V/dPTZRMyxOHX5755WvhOxYhWYeXJ5M0MdwVHR0FASPtlsQ5C1tCRIS91aXUtg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1774457176; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=eVZb3wm4yoJhlpy+bnpND9Jt+fuPL0clUMNrRbmkhZ3QNujQc/gD8lzluH+tQI1jlEJpXa VLgss06dUEltuKM3hlMoC0x5mTmZ3F6+8Mz4FztmNd9cH6Y0KVPZTtjAtQd2r/+sAab2oI +uBJ2+u8nqNGUTRaMYHP+pPMtiEzsABKCTcjRepIPQpiRthDzqDs0pw3G07J19o/Jptgpg 2cm4KUszygEZTh5CazdkbrN0gW+3txAQNIsCH2Ybtz/yJlHCKV3v5MJWA7sKDuLWoyTg0O 5yj3IVjkJtX1KzNwZDxhwhwXEtKMmK4D9lz+oLUVNeUCQIQ+m4Ebrj8Bo8DSTQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1774457176; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=C32o+w3bncCsYAp5Cd+5entwNKbDUGmDYasV+grngKw=; b=eOohF4SbLR3jXvjbyvA1UwHDZK1HoXuAKya+yLiiOmwmWk0IbsUOhBx3jYlAQdi1g56y5v TDCYhK9thDTWuuiKFuP9/6BWRbIal9Qu0IJdZrWV9Q0bDb6/bUfgkSOTUySm0u2DXzHCBO Hve87Pd0bM/mXkUjrftPOiNU+42+s4tZIGT7TPUN03hwsbt6YXpfGRpoAYNMFir9WlAYz5 OQ3BdnLDerClZe0jvfLBijIcAbvI+OA2sYumfpm8+dkaIWExxg0HBNT0Wjrgna4LxHhqZX OiXpOZTOlcZHqwBfrU6xv/YKoKQC+Kvqu2V5IEMABGl9ItGdvhLM+HZgMenNDQ== Received: from amaryllis.le-fay.org (amaryllis.le-fay.org [IPv6:2a00:1098:6b:400::9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ivy/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4fgt8R3QrgzwCZ; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivy@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:46:03 +0000 From: Lexi Winter To: hackers , pkgbase Subject: Re: more pkgbase reviewers required Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: hackers , pkgbase References: <7B32EC96-7D56-41B1-940F-DE3C84DE08E9@nomadlogic.org> List-Id: Packaging the FreeBSD base system List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkgbase List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zT8EB37IfpNvJGhG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --zT8EB37IfpNvJGhG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexander Ziaee wrote in : > On 2026-03-25 11:13 -04:00 EDT, "Pete Wright" wrote: > > Understood - I=E2=80=99ll let yall with commit bits do your thing and g= et > > out of the way since it sounds like it=E2=80=99ll just be noise. >=20 > No, it's not noise. Community reviews are extremely helpful. What I > believe ivy is saying is that her specific ask in this thread is that > more committers review to satisfy the goal that we have a consensus > about changes. right. the current situation is that no one has objected to any outstanding pkgbase changes, but also no one has approved them, so we can't land them. feedback from non-committers is always appreciate because, of course, we don't want to land changes that cause issues for users, so it's good if users will review changes before they land. notwithstanding that, my specific purpose in this thread is to get more reviews from committers, because that is what we need to land changes, and i've had changes pending since January that i can't land due to not having a review. so iow, i'm not saying we don't want reviews from non-committers, because we do, and if any non-committers are reading this i would encourage you to review pkgbase changes. but the specific problem i'm having here is that we do need reviews from committers in order to progress with development. that said, since i posted this, several people have commented on the outstanding reviews i mentioned, so thank you for that. --zT8EB37IfpNvJGhG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCacQRRwAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YMNBAQDNoAFhRgYUy2nW3WHXwqiqXqzwaL4sCghBFQeP8wsH/QEA3l/adrDzRRuQ 3hT7x34M40prdaVIz5kGEjs6krWiOwg= =UOd5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zT8EB37IfpNvJGhG--