From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 18 03:44:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9D237B401 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 03:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5309743F85 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 03:44:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5IAinb0068162; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:44:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5IAimSf068161; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:44:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 12:44:48 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Terry Lambert Message-ID: <20030618104448.GA68146@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <3EEF00E4.9000908@freebsd.mheller.org> <20030617121424.GA11867@mooseriver.com> <3EF01817.3186204C@mindspring.com> <20030618084510.GB67404@freebie.xs4all.nl> <3EF035C8.FF957A9B@mindspring.com> <20030618100613.GA67909@freebie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030618100613.GA67909@freebie.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-OS: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com Subject: Re: Interview in Byte with Chris Sontag/SCO and FUD relating toBSDsettlement agreement X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:44:51 -0000 On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:06:13PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 02:50:00AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > > Where can one find a copy of the settlement agreement? > > > > > > > > Since it's part of a sealed court record, with non-disclosure > > > > agreements required of both parties as the only publically > > > > acknowledged part of the agreement, you would have to file a > > > > Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) request to view the settlement. > > > > > > Pfff.. sealed court record. Something you expect of a child abuse > > > court case, not for a argument about bloody source code. > > > > Most settled cases result in a sealed record. It's one of > > the main incentives to settle: so that the publicity doesn't > > damage your business, in case you act like an idiot. 8-). > ^ > ^ exactly my point ;) Or: in the case of child abuse: "to protect the innocent" in the case of the source code: "to protect the idiots" 8-)) -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte