Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 10:39:25 -0600 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> To: Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r343543 - head/sbin/bectl/tests Message-ID: <CACNAnaH5Qnfzenkwe1obM0DOfUZbvTjWg79o7FAobPrT6WYcaA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <674E01AB-49C7-4B40-B2FD-6EB4AFEAB1FD@gmail.com> References: <201901290408.x0T48oJQ080243@repo.freebsd.org> <CACNAnaEmeQLwB%2Ba8KWyqB3GFWDn7on4gYtDrH7i5G6mj3zfSJw@mail.gmail.com> <674E01AB-49C7-4B40-B2FD-6EB4AFEAB1FD@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:32 AM Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 28, 2019, at 20:10, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 10:09 PM Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote= : > >> > >> Author: kevans > >> Date: Tue Jan 29 04:08:49 2019 > >> New Revision: 343543 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/343543 > >> > >> Log: > >> bectl(8) test: Force destroy the zpool in cleanup > >> > >> This is a wild guess as to why bectl tests failed once upon a time in= CI, > >> given no apparent way to see a transcript of cleanup routines with Ky= ua. The > >> bectl tests construct a new, clean zpool for every test. The failure > >> indicated was because of a mount that was leftover from a previous te= st, but > >> the previous test had succeeded so it's not clear how the mount remai= ned > >> leftover unless the `zpool get health ${pool}` had somehow failed. > >> > > > > I left out: the tests are supposed to be constructed to clean up any > > mounts that were left over in the course of the test, hence the > > assumption that the failure lies in the cleanup. > > Hi Kyle, > > The tests use a deterministic zpool name defined locally (not globally), = and will only destroy the zpool if =E2=80=9Czpool get health=E2=80=9D succe= eds. > > The tests will work the first time (when the zpool doesn=E2=80=99t exist)= , but I believe they=E2=80=99re actually introducing nondeterminism by acci= dent. I will propose a fix for this. > > There=E2=80=99s a way to decipher why things failed from /var/log/message= s and kyua output. It=E2=80=99s just nontrivial to those who don=E2=80=99t = know what to look for. Can you please provide a failing ci run? > Hi, Thanks! Any help is appreciated -- my inquiry to -testing@ in response to the weekly report where the failing test [1] was mentioned has been met with silence. The failure is consistent in the i386-test job, but amd64-test sees nothing of the sort (and neither does my local testing). [1] https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-12-i386-test/426/testReport/s= bin.bectl/bectl_test/bectl_mount/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaH5Qnfzenkwe1obM0DOfUZbvTjWg79o7FAobPrT6WYcaA>