Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:02:59 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undefined reference to `memset' Message-ID: <20050324220259.GA770@drjekyll.mkbuelow.net> In-Reply-To: <42431F9D.5080906@samsco.org> References: <IDTR9T00.LMF@hadar.amcc.com> <200503232122.01937.peter@wemm.org> <86acosykew.fsf@xps.des.no> <42431F9D.5080906@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long writes: >No it doesn't. See the gymnastics that Bill Paul had to do recently in >the iee80211 code to get around the insane inlining that gcc does with >-O2. I'm not saying that gcc produces incorrect code, but I am saying >that there is very strong evidence that it produces code that is >incompatible with the restrictions inherent to the kernel, mainly that >stack space is not infinite. I wonder how this is being done elsewhere, on NetBSD, everything is built with -O2 and has been for several years afair. Not that I care much about it but apparently it doesn't seem to be such a big problem everywhere? mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050324220259.GA770>