From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 21:34:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D0B96A for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB537D0 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAILYja0008906 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:34:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195128] Memory leaks in lib/libpam/modules due to memory handling with login_getcapstr, et al Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:34:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: darius@dons.net.au X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:34:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195128 --- Comment #5 from darius@dons.net.au --- It would appear to lie also, or at least I can't work out how it would free anything :) int cgetclose(void) { if (pfp != NULL) { (void)fclose(pfp); pfp = NULL; } dbp = NULL; gottoprec = 0; slash = 0; return(0); } int cgetstr(char *buf, const char *cap, char **str) { ... if ((mem = malloc(SFRAG)) == NULL) { errno = ENOMEM; return (-2); /* couldn't even allocate the first fragment */ } ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.