From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 26 10:07:35 1999
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA08864
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:07:35 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA08838
          for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:07:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jfieber@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu)
Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost)
	by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA06907;
	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:07:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 13:07:04 -0500 (EST)
From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
To: Matt Behrens <matt@zigg.com>
cc: Chris Stenton <jacs@gnome.co.uk>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: old version of PAM in 3.0-stable  stopping Samba working?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901261205570.15983-100000@megaweapon.zigg.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901261258110.6851-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Matt Behrens wrote:

> It looks to me that PAM isn't quite "Linux-compatible", and Samba
> was definitely written for Linux PAM.

How so?  It looked to me like the original poster was just trying
to use pam modules for a services they don't implement:

> : samba   account requisite       pam_cleartext_pass_ok.so
> : samba   account required        pam_unix.so                     try_first_pass

That doesn't mean the library is broken or incompatible, just
that our modules are different.  (And as I said, somewhat
minimalist at this point in time.)

-john


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message