From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 08:11:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DAAB4CC1E; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:11:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu [IPv6:2a00:c98:2200:af07:6::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DFD1E21; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:11:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6112361FEC; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:11:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:11:12 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD,Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20160527081112.GA9827@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org References: <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <016845dd-2c42-5aeb-f65d-02a6fb77acec@seacom.mu> <20160527.085355.74680254.sthaug@nethelp.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160527.085355.74680254.sthaug@nethelp.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 08:11:15 -0000 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline sthaug@nethelp.no [2016-05-27 08:53 +0200] : > I don't see any problem using ULA with for instance /124 netmask: [...] > 96 bit works too: [...] FreeBSD version? Mine is 10.3-RELEASE-p3. Dunno. Could be that I made some mistake but I also tried the setup with /96 and adding the route to the tap0 interface and it did not work. Niklaas --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXSAERAAoJEG2fODeJrIU/gT8P/jmFYdb80paqS3JMoIuIha3O OT4hlqGjC2fifqrUSNFbacly/32aHnYkJflj1L9i+yxpBj+xsqCjCC7jlBAcA/S3 y3i9ssyAINGnpJFPNJlfy0HGnLFQmtSIpKMF78okbp5a2C8yc/faaPWNbL+ENk9/ 1cRF5D+OHJcIX7vYG4GEiAGbDeyT46ShcCc4X96Ib9JUlG9MOcA41RlyDmjWDPPL b7DhUg1+3GcJNzEJyjw5Ku1bXx8FEjFlYg7lLzkNNtdqTKe9DYyUIcQKshdjQX++ es+QNQ7DWE7FANdobaGJOOhwbVhw79zRxNHNlA9P+RCsqubJSbFSveQm1ywhvM5n keWJextLhWxFkeFwQcSfYEOX0RDAk0fZmKTHOb+/aCiTVfgCbghn/Aa1qaAViM1x iRduZOrZj49iK/C2h0yU4vyCUpZKAO1GQx3VcmXnirBjeLrUkfqK6QLwhLE5RIBT uw5LkJhbw0erdRvP2Mhuxb9swY6V2GG14L1m7pTc6hvy4aMEB0daiAjggfPOEu0s JD7weR1rMbeGFszkdbLZ8C3LJNwyxpL+L6+4Ob2dcT7vBWBrjK/R3TmrcUPnpsff bGEmeGODyVWg9z2GxGrhescn+z7YFEx9tN/EVyxJKbycxNCHbi0KhEvrr69l1CKd WcEih1wMqJeo5SlkgbU5 =7FDq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--