From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Feb 16 08:29:39 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id IAA29978 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 08:29:39 -0800
Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA29970 for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 08:29:37 -0800
Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <768>; Thu, 16 Feb 1995 08:38:51 -0800
Date: 	Thu, 16 Feb 1995 08:38:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@haven.uniserve.com>
To: Wilfred van der Deijl <jg@euronet.nl>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Name server
In-Reply-To: <199502161345.OAA00314@host.jcn.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950216083615.3565A-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 16 Feb 1995, Wilfred van der Deijl wrote:

> Does anyoe know what 'lame delegation' means? Also the empty strings ('') 
> don't seem right to me?

  It's when your nameserver contacts another nameserver that should be 
authoratative for some domain, but wasn't. 

Tom