From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jul  9 14:57:23 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA14424
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 14:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA14419
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 14:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA02466; Wed, 9 Jul 1997 14:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Andrew Atrens" <atrens@nortel.ca>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: no SYSVSHM in GENERIC now.. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "09 Jul 1997 15:16:00 EDT."
             <199707091923.MAA02400@hub.freebsd.org> 
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 1997 14:55:12 -0700
Message-ID: <2462.868485312@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Does the X-server run any faster with MIT-SHM than without?

Uh.  I think you're fundamentally confused as to the nature of the
MIT-SHM extention. :-)  It's only used by a few extention lib calls 
which allow you to create shared pixmaps and such.

					Jordan