From owner-freebsd-arch Mon May 28 2:43:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA5D37B42C for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:43:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA14860; Mon, 28 May 2001 11:43:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Dima Dorfman Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: {kbd,vid}control insanity patch References: <20010528034937.EF2973E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 28 May 2001 11:43:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20010528034937.EF2973E28@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dima Dorfman writes: > Why? It's still useful; -h isn't the only option kbdcontrol has. It > at may still be desirable to be able to set -b or -r on all virtual > terminals. Damn, yet another kbdcontrol bug. This - like every other vty- specific knob - should be in vidcontrol. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message