From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 09:21:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E68B16A4CE
	for <ipfw@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exchange.wan.no (exchange.wan.no [80.86.128.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05ED743D2F
	for <ipfw@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:21:54 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sten.daniel.sorsdal@wan.no)
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:21:52 +0100
Message-ID: <0AF1BBDF1218F14E9B4CCE414744E70F5D977C@exchange.wanglobal.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: semantics of 'not-applicable' options in ipfw ?
Thread-Index: AcPaulN3I0OC6nBDTOCLSuWvivr8zQACFbPg
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= <sten.daniel.sorsdal@wan.no>
To: "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@icir.org>, <ipfw@freebsd.org>
Subject: RE: semantics of 'not-applicable' options in ipfw ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:21:56 -0000

> As the subject says... what is people's opinion on the best=20
> semantics for 'not-applicable' options in ipfw rules ?
>=20

I think 'none'.

_// Sten Daniel S=F8rsdal