Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:34:46 +0200 From: Peter Schuller <peter.schuller@infidyne.com> To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.geom.debugflags=16 does NOT allow me to write to device Message-ID: <r2h5a1151761004230334p1f8be0cdv93c3cacf00882c2f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BD1615E.9010909@yandex.ru> References: <y2z5a1151761004221355l391c05f4qc6c0f760321b56f5@mail.gmail.com> <20100423082345.GA27379@icarus.home.lan> <4BD1615E.9010909@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It's easy. Thank you for posting the example. I never really understood that gpart was to be the generic tool; I thought it was gpt specific. Obviously I should have read up better. Is gpart to be considered "tested", "stable", "production quality" and/or "default" now then, or is it still cutting edge/experimental? So for example, would it make sense to submit patches (not promising anything) to adjust the handbook and relegate disklabel to an historical artifact? -- / Peter Schuller
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?r2h5a1151761004230334p1f8be0cdv93c3cacf00882c2f>