From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 21:05:57 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D7AC7A2;
 Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:05:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailhub.siol.net (mailoutvs3.siol.net [213.250.19.136])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE43D4D;
 Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:05:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mailhub.siol.net (Zimbra) with ESMTP id 80FC152258C;
 Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:05:50 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at psrvmta01.zcs-production.pri
Received: from mailhub.siol.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (psrvmta01.zcs-production.pri [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10024)
 with ESMTP id BG2Gg4wsBy7e; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:05:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from gate.unitedpeople.net. (BSN-143-58-33.dynamic.siol.net
 [89.143.58.33]) (Authenticated sender: miklav25)
 by mailhub.siol.net (Zimbra) with ESMTPSA id 2339F52237E;
 Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:05:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.8.149] (tpwi.unitedpeople.net [192.168.8.149])
 by gate.unitedpeople.net. (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t0CL5mnn084500;
 Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:05:48 +0100 (CET)
 (envelope-from karel.miklav@siol.net)
Message-ID: <54B4372C.9040803@siol.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:05:48 +0100
From: Karel Miklav <karel.miklav@siol.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net>,
 freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages?
References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> <54A97748.9000401@gmx.net>
 <F8F2C00190BADAE1AA7CFEF8@atuin.in.mat.cc> <54B3FD78.5060404@gmx.net>
 <D5E3B7024DE7A949DDF12468@ogg.in.absolight.net> <54B40822.9000702@gmx.net>
 <23A49BD336E4EC29F493416A@ogg.in.absolight.net>
In-Reply-To: <23A49BD336E4EC29F493416A@ogg.in.absolight.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:05:57 -0000

On 12.01.2015 18:55, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Well, no, there is not, and unless you figure out an algorithm to do it,
> and I'm saying algorithm in the mathematical sense, not heuristic, that is,
> one that is always right, feel free to submit a patch for it :-)
> Now, there's a good chance that it will be slower than rebuilding all the
> dependencies.

What about the logic in pkg, aren't both programs solving the same problem?

Regards,
Karel